To Report or Not to Report: The New ESG Dilemma
Europe trimmed the CSRD. Brazil reversed mandatory ESG reporting. Can companies in Europe and Latin America step back from sustainability disclosure? The evidence says otherwise.
Key takeaways
- Regulatory rollback in Europe and Brazil does not reduce reputational, financial or strategic risk.
- 90% of European companies leaving CSRD scope plan to keep or expand voluntary reporting.
- Banks, multinationals and investors now act as a faster, stricter regulator than the State itself.
- For companies across Europe and Latin America, preparing now is a competitive advantage — not optional compliance.
Over the past several months, the regulatory landscape for sustainability reporting has taken some unexpected turns. Europe dramatically scaled back the scope of the CSRD through the Omnibus I package. Brazil, which was on track to become one of the most demanding ESG disclosure regimes among emerging markets, reversed its mandatory reporting requirement. And in the United States, federal action on sustainability disclosure remains at a standstill.
For many executives, the immediate read is tempting: if regulators are stepping back, why keep investing in sustainability reporting? The answer, supported by the most recent evidence, is clear — and understanding it is a competitive advantage today.
Regulatory rollback does not equal a reduction in reputational, financial, or strategic risk.
What Actually Changed — and What Didn't
Through the Omnibus I package — politically agreed by the European Parliament in December 2025 and formally signed off by the Council in early 2026 — the EU substantially amended the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive). It raised the applicability thresholds and, through the simplified ESRS, cut the number of mandatory data points by roughly 60%. The result: an estimated around 90% of companies originally within scope are no longer obligated to report under this framework.
In Brazil, on May 27, 2026, the securities regulator CVM (through Resolution CVM 244) reversed its mandatory ISSB-aligned reporting requirement for publicly listed companies, adopting instead a voluntary "comply-or-explain" model effective from 2027.
The change aims to preserve transparency and comparability while restoring respect for entities' freedom to assess the expected costs and benefits of their decisions.
— Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM), Brazil
What didn't change is equally significant: European banks remain required by the European Banking Authority (EBA) to consider climate risks when issuing loans. This means SMEs and mid-sized companies no longer obligated to report under regulation will still face pressure to disclose ESG information — through their lenders and their larger customers who remain within CSRD scope.
The Market Speaks Louder Than the Regulator
Here is the data point that should matter most to any sustainability director or CFO: according to a 2026 survey by software firm osapiens, 90% of European companies no longer required to report under the CSRD plan to maintain or even expand their voluntary sustainability reporting activities.
Why? Because sustainability data is no longer just a compliance requirement — it is a strategic input. Companies use it to manage supply chains, design products, access green finance, and meet investor and customer expectations.
The figures from the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) in its 2026 Corporate Health Check confirm this: the number of organizations disclosing their environmental data surpassed 23,000 in its latest cycle, representing nearly two-thirds of global market capitalization. The true differentiating factor is financial: companies rated at CDP's environmental-leadership level realized USD 218 billion in environmental opportunities over the past 12 months — evidence that environmental excellence correlates with growth and capital attraction.
What the world's top consulting firms are reporting
This profitability-driven view is echoed by the leading global advisory firms, whose 2026 analyses reframe sustainability from cost center to value driver:
The Reinvention Imperative
In PwC's 29th Annual Global CEO Survey (Davos, January 2026), a significant share of Energy & Resources and Consumer Markets CEOs report that they have already built defined processes around climate risks and opportunities into their supply chains and product design — capturing opportunity regardless of government mandates.
BCG — Financial Resilience
In the BCG + CO2 AI Climate Survey 2025 ("How Companies Are Tackling the Climate Challenge—and Creating Value"), 82% of companies reported capturing direct economic benefits from decarbonization, and nearly half saw a return on investment above 10% a year on their climate initiatives — proof that climate action is fundamentally an economic decision.
McKinsey — From Risk to Value
McKinsey's classic analysis "Five ways that ESG creates value" finds that strong execution on ESG can improve operating profit by as much as 60%, chiefly through resource efficiency and lower operating costs — alongside green-product revenue and access to preferential financing.
The Waterfall Effect in the Value Chain (B2B)
While state regulators may have paused certain reporting requirements, the commercial market has not. A clear example of this "waterfall effect" — or de facto regulation — is SME participation: in the latest CDP reporting cycle, thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises chose to voluntarily disclose their data.
The primary reason is straightforward: European and North American multinationals — their corporate clients — demand this data to meet their own Scope 3 climate targets. Today, the B2B commercial market acts as a faster and stricter regulator than the State itself. Without consistent ESG data, suppliers risk being directly excluded from the international supply chain.
What This Means for Companies in Europe and Latin America
For companies in Europe, the current scenario is one of active regulatory uncertainty. Even after the Omnibus narrowed the CSRD, several member states — Spain among them — have yet to fully transpose the directive into national law, leaving the precise obligations in flux. This is not a pause; it is a signal that the regulatory architecture will keep evolving, and companies that prepare now will have a real advantage when definitive frameworks are established.
For companies across Latin America — particularly those that export to Europe, supply multinationals, or access international financing — the message is the same: the demand for ESG transparency does not come only from regulators. It comes from commercial counterparties, banks, and investors.
Brazil may have made ISSB reporting voluntary, but Brazilian companies that choose not to report will be required to publicly explain that decision starting in 2027. Across the rest of the region, scrutiny from impact funds, multilateral banks, and value-chain standards set by European and North American companies already functions as de facto regulation.
The Right Strategic Position
Regulatory rollback is not an invitation to inaction — it is an opportunity to build a more robust reporting practice, focused on what genuinely matters to the business rather than on checking compliance boxes.
The companies that emerge strongest will not be those that waited for regulatory clarity — but those that used this pause to build stronger, strategy-linked information systems.
The regulatory pendulum will keep swinging. The question is whether your company is ready for when it returns — with reporting that is relevant, credible, and aligned with current international standards, regardless of where the pendulum stands at any given moment.
Position your company before the pendulum returns
At Yabrudy Solutions, we help companies across the globe design sustainability and ESG reporting strategies that are relevant, credible, and built to last. If you're assessing how to position your company in this new landscape, we'd welcome the conversation.
Start the conversation →About the author
Nathalie Yabrudy González
Managing Consultant · Yabrudy Solutions
Nathalie advises companies across Europe and Latin America on sustainability, ESG reporting strategy, Decarbonization, Climate Risk Management and Reduction — Tracking Impact, Shaping Solutions.
Sources
- ESG Today — Brazil Shifts from Mandatory to Voluntary Sustainability Reporting (June 2026)
- David Carlin, Weekly Digest — Sustainability Reporting Moves Forward Despite Regulatory Rollbacks (May 29, 2026)
- ESG Today — 90% of Companies No Longer in CSRD Scope Plan to Maintain, Expand Sustainability Reporting
- osapiens — Beyond Compliance: Sustainability Reporting After the Omnibus (2026)
- European Council — Sign-off on simplification of CSRD & CSDDD (Omnibus I) (Feb 2026)
- DLA Piper — EU Omnibus I Directive amending CSRD and CSDDD; Deloitte DART — EU Sustainability Reporting Omnibus & ESRS Updates
- CDP — Corporate Health Check 2026: Defying Global Headwinds (January 14, 2026)
- PwC — 29th Annual Global CEO Survey: The Reinvention Imperative (January 2026)
- BCG & CO2 AI — How Companies Are Tackling the Climate Challenge—and Creating Value (Climate Survey 2025)
- McKinsey & Company — Five ways that ESG creates value
